Workers Compensation

Updates


 

A. INTRODUCTION


Every Queensland employer must have workers’ compensation insurance. Most employers insure with WorkCover Queensland, while a small number of large organisations have their own insurance. This insurance coverage ensures that employees injured at work receive financial support. WorkCover Queensland provides insurance coverage for approximately 137,000 Queensland employers, compensating and helping their workers with work-related injuries.


B. STATUTORY CLAIMS


In general, a worker can apply for compensation regardless of who or what caused the work-related injury —this is called a statutory claim. If a worker applies for compensation, an employer needs to: send an Employer’s Report form to WorkCover within eight business days of learning of the injury and pay the injured worker for the day of the injury.


WorkCover can now apply penalties to an employer who pays their own claims.


An application for workers compensation should be lodged within six months of the injury occurring. Each application is assessed against criteria set out in the Act, including:

whether the person is a ‘worker’;

whether the person suffered an ‘injury’;

whether the person’s employment was a significant contributing factor to their injury.


To help WorkCover reach a decision, it may wish to talk to you, your employer, people who witnessed the injury or your treating doctor. WorkCover will write to you as soon as a decision is made. WorkCover decides most claims in two weeks, however complex claims may take longer and some applications can take up to three months or longer to assess. You may need to consider leave options such as sick leave or annual leave to help relieve any financial distress you may suffer during this time.


If WorkCover accepts your application and you need rehabilitation, a WorkCover case manager will work with you, your treating doctor and your employer or their rehabilitation coordinator to achieve a timely and safe return to work. Workplaces with more than 30 workers must have a rehabilitation coordinator.


If you are not satisfied with a WorkCover decision, you have a right to request that the decision be reviewed by Q-COMP. If you do not agree with Q-COMP’s review decision, you can appeal to the Industrial Magistrate to review Q-COMP’s decision. If you do not agree with the Industrial Magistrate’s decision, you have the right of appeal to the Industrial Court but only in a narrow range of circumstances.


 

Workers’ compensation covers a wide range of injuries. While the most common injuries are sprains, strains and cuts, work-related injuries also include:

 

  • hearing loss (industrial deafness);

  • aggravation to pre-existing injuries (WorkCover only covers the aggravation and not the pre-existing condition itself);

  • diseases (e.g. Q-Fever);

  • psychological/psychiatric injuries (conditions such as depression or anxiety);

  • fatal work-related injuries.


Even if the injury didn’t happen in the workplace, it may still be covered if it happened:

  • on a work break;

  • while working away from your usual worksite (or travelling between worksites);

  • while working interstate or overseas;

  • travelling between work and home e.g. on the way to or from work (this is called a journey claim.


If WorkCover accepts the application, you will receive compensation benefits and start rehabilitation, if needed. Depending on your injury, these benefits may include:

  • weekly compensation payments;

  • medical treatments costs (e.g. doctor, physiotherapy);

  • hospitalisation costs;

  • travelling expenses;

  • rehabilitation costs; and

  • an offer of lump sum statutory compensation for any permanent impairment.


Workers receive compensation in the form of a stepped percentage of their base pre application wages. Practically, statutory compensation is normally paid for 12 months before a worker is referred to a Medical Assessment Tribunal for an assessment of their residual impairment. Depending on the percentage impairment assessed by the MAT, a worker will be offered a lump some statutory compensation payment to finalise their statutory claim. Depending on the percentage assessment, you may have to make an election whether to accept the lump sum statutory compensation payment or pursue a common law claim against your employer.


C. COMMON LAW CLAIMS


If you can prove that your injury was a result of your employer’s breach of statutory duty, breach of contract or negligence, you may be able to make a common law claim. You can only make a common law claim if you follow processes set out in the legislation. Most claims are resolved outside the court system following negotiations between you (generally through your solicitor), the employer and WorkCover.


Generally, when we speak of “common law” we are referring to judge-made law. When we speak of “common law damages” we are referring to judge-awarded damages. In making their decisions, judges must apply the “statute law” (eg. legislation such as the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996, Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 and the Workplace Health & Safety Act 1995) as well as the “common law” (ie. previous decisions from higher courts).


In Queensland, injured workers generally have two avenues for compensation. The first is statutory “no fault” compensation (considered above). A person is entitled to compensation if injured at work or in the course of certain defined journeys in connection with that work, irrespective of “fault”. Statutory compensation covers hospital, medical and rehabilitation expenses, the replacement of lost wages and, in some cases, lump sum compensation for permanent disability and care or assistance costs. Statutory compensation payments are finite and do not usually continue after the injured worker’s condition becomes “stable and stationary”.


The second avenue is common law damages. An injured worker usually seeks common law damages when the worker believes that the statutory compensation is inadequate and that the employer is legally liable for the injury. In most cases, the injured worker must choose between a lump sum payment for permanent disability and a claim for common law damages. Unlike statutory compensation, an injured worker is only entitled to recover common law damages if the court finds that the employer was legally liable for the injury. This can be through negligence, breach of contract or breach of statute. An employer is considered negligent if there has been a breach of the “duty of care” owed to workers. A breach of the duty of care is usually found in cases where the employer has failed to provide a safe system of work. Common law damages are generally substantially larger than statutory compensation but the injured worker must approve “fault” on the part of the employer. Court proceedings for common law claims must be commenced within three years of the injury occurring.


In order to found an action for personal injuries in negligence, a plaintiff must establish the following elements:

  • the existence of a duty of care;

  • breach of the duty;

  • damage was occasioned by the breach (causation); and

  • that the damage was foreseeable and not too remote.


The onus of proof of causation rests with the plaintiff to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the loss or injury was caused or materially contributed to by the defendant’s wrongful act. A plaintiff need only prove that the defendant’s actions were a cause, not necessarily the sole cause, of injury or damage.


The common law of Queensland recognises a duty of care on the part of employers towards their employees. A court action can be commenced against employers breaching their duty of care with negligence as the basis for the action. The duty has received varying judicial expression but it is essentially “a duty of care . . . to provide adequate plant and equipment, a safe place of work and a safe system of work for . . . employees”.


The plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s negligence was a material cause of the injury. The employer’s breach of duty in this case can be characterised as a failure to provide a safe system of work. The question of whether the defendant/employer has breached a duty of care involves a consideration of:

  • the magnitude of foreseeable risk;

  • the probability of the occurrence of the risk; and

  • the expense, difficulty and inconvenience in taking alleviating action.


In a claim based upon negligently inflicted psychiatric damage, the following issues must be considered:

  • the plaintiff must have suffered a recognisable psychiatric illness;

  • it is assumed that the plaintiff is a person of reasonable fortitude; and

  • the difficulty will often be in pointing to precisely what warning or instruction ought to have been given, especially for employees experienced, hardened by training or experience or operating in a position which, by its very nature, would involve a heavy and stressful workload.


The workers compensation legislation has been amended in recent years to strengthen workers’ obligations to ensure their own safety in employment. Queensland remains one of the few states where employees enjoy unrestricted common law rights. However, there are election provisions which apply to workers who suffer work-related impairment of less than 20%. Workers who receive a final assessment from WorkCover of more than 20% work related impairment retain their full rights. Where a worker receives an assessment of work related impairment of less than 20%, it is necessary for the worker to elect whether to accept payment of a sum of money calculated according to statutory tables or pursue a claim for common law damages.


There are six main steps in the common law process:


Step 1. Assessment of injuries

WorkCover arranges for the worker’s injuries to be assessed (normally through the statutory claim process).


Step 2. Notice of Claim for Damages

The injured worker must serve WorkCover and the employer with a notice that sets out personal particulars, the circumstances and consequences of the injury and why the employer is considered to be liable for the injury. The injured worker must also make an offer to settle the claim. A person from WorkCover’s Common Law Division will then be appointed to manage the claim. Others who may be involved in the management of the claim include a factual investigator and a lawyer, appointed by WorkCover.


WorkCover will contact the employer’s representative to discuss the claim and will arrange for any necessary investigations to be carried out and for all relevant documents to be collated.


Step 3. WorkCover’s response to the claim

Once the claim has been investigated, WorkCover must advise the injured worker whether WorkCover admits liability and, if so, to what extent and how much WorkCover is prepared to offer to settle the claim.


Step 4. The compulsory conference

If WorkCover’s response does not result in a settlement of the claim, a conference must be held within three months. The employer will be invited to attend the conference. The conference will usually be attended by:

  • the employer;

  • the injured worker;

  • the injured worker’s lawyer;

  • WorkCover’s case manager; and

  • WorkCover’s lawyer.


In some cases, a mediator will also attend to help facilitate a resolution. The conference allows the parties to discuss their differences and hopefully resolve the claim. Most matters settle at the compulsory conference stage, which means significant costs savings for all parties.


Step 5. Court proceedings

If the matter cannot be settled at the compulsory conference, an injured worker may take legal proceedings in the courts. To commence legal proceedings, the injured worker will serve the employer with a Claim and Statement of Claim. The employer should inform WorkCover as soon as this occurs. After certain procedural steps and assuming the matter does not resolve, there will be a trial.


Step 6. Trial

Trials may concentrate on liability and/or quantum issues. Employers, their representatives and witnesses may also be required to give evidence. Experts (eg. engineers and doctors) may also be called to give evidence. After all the evidence has been heard, the judge will hand down a decision. The decision is binding for both parties, unless appealed.


In actions for personal injuries, damages are awarded to the successful plaintiff by the payment of a sum of money to compensate for the injuries so caused. There are three relevant principles:

  • The fundamental aim of the compensatory principle is to put the party affected as nearly as possible in the position they would have been in had the injury not occurred;

  • Damages for one cause of action must be recovered once and forever and (in the absence of statutory exceptions) must be awarded as one lump sum; and

  • The court has no concern with the manner in which the plaintiff uses the sum awarded.


At common law, the primary elements which are to be considered in assessing an award of damages are:

  • general damages consisting of pain and suffering and loss of amenities or enjoyment of life;

  • special damages comprising out of pocket expenses for medical treatment and the like;

  • economic loss, past and future; and

  • compensation for the provision of gratuitous care services by members of your family; and

  • interest on the above elements.


Significant restrictions have been placed upon the availability of compensation for gratuitous assistance of the kind normally provided by family members. Further, damages to persons other than the claimant, including claims for loss of consortium, have been excluded. The legislation also places restrictions on the recovery of damages for future economic loss. The legislation also restricts the interest that may be awarded on damages. Interest is now limited to paid special damages and actual past economic loss after reducing the amount of compensation paid. The amount of damages that an employer is legally liable to pay to a claimant for an injury must be reduced by the total amount paid by WorkCover by way of compensation under the statutory scheme. The common law duty of mitigation of loss applies to a worker who has sustained an injury and is required to participate in rehabilitation. The onus of proving that all reasonable steps to mitigate damages have been taken lies on the plaintiff.


The following is a list of the heads of damages seen from time to time in personal injuries actions although it is not exhaustive:

  • Past out of pocket expenses;

  • Refunds to Medicare;

  • Refunds to WorkCover for hospital, medical and other expenses;

  • Refunds to private insurers;

  • Travelling expenses;

  • Past pharmaceutical costs;

  • The “top up” between public and private health fund rebates and actual costs;

  • Physiotherapy costs;

  • Future surgical, physiotherapy and/or pharmaceutical costs;

  • Past and future paid domestic or other assistance;

  • Past and future economic loss;

  • Future loss of opportunity;

  • Loss of superannuation benefits; and

  • General damages.


 


How to Contact Us


By Telephone
07 3831 0333

By Email
Please complete the form below to send us your query








Introductory Video

.

Testimonials


This helped the organisation to make decisions about its strategic approach to the case. Rob appeared for TUH at a conciliation conference in the Commission which resulted in a satisfactory resolution of the matter. He was a strong advocate for the organisation and we were happy with his assistance.

Sarah Morris, Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
Teachers’ Union Health




Kingston Park Raceway has used Rob Stevenson for our employment law needs for several years. We are a flexible and dynamic workforce that was looking for a platform that satisfied all of our employee needs whilst working a rotating 7 day roster. Rob’s understanding of these needs and ability to work well with our employment requirements has enabled us to produce an easy to understand collective agreement approved by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission covering my workforce.


This has provided a stable industrial environment for the operation of Kingston Park Raceway and allowed the business to work harmoniously whilst still continuing to grow. The demands on employers is sometime overwhelming but Rob has been easy to understand and professional in his approach and we have been very happy with the results achieved.

Terry Skene, Director
Kingston Park Raceway




Rob Stevenson has helped us to successfully resolve a claim of unfair/unlawful dismissal by a former employee which involved proceedings in the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and the Federal Magistrates Court. Rob was able to explain the legal processes to us in terms we understood. He also advised us about practical issues in the case which greatly assisted us in making decisions.


He engaged excellent counsel and worked with the barrister as a team to ensure our organisation received the best possible outcome. He attended to matters promptly and was readily accessible. As an individual and on behalf of the organisation, I would have no hesitation in recommending his services.

Leisa Fraser, Finance Officer
Goolburri Health Advancement Aboriginal Corporation


 



I have been dealing with Rob for a number of years in relation to workplace issues in my business. He has been generous with his time in discussing the employment issues which have arisen in my business from time to time. He has prepared Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) for use in my business which were approved by the Workplace Authority.


He has also helped with advice on post employment restraint issues on several occasions. As an owner of a growing business, I have appreciated his practical advice and assistance and recommend his services in the employment law area.

Paul Davis, Director
Paul Davis Personal Trainers Pty Ltd




My company provides systems safety engineering, assessment and training services to the rail, defence and aerospace industries. Rob has helped my business by reviewing and advising on consultancy contracts with customers, preparing employment agreements for use in the business and assisting me with advice on the legal requirements for managing employee performance.


He has been readily contactable and has provided sensible advice. I am grateful for his advice and I feel it has been invaluable in avoiding many of the pitfalls facing business operators.

Dr Alena Griffiths, Director
System Safety & Quality Engineering Pty Ltd



Rob has provided employment legal advice and assistance to QAIHC and its member organisations and presented QIHFN seminar presentations on workplace legal issues and changes to workplace relations legislation. Rob has a practical and friendly style which has been appreciated and he responded quickly to requests for advice.

Helen Hewett
Director, Fineline Consultancy Pty Ltd




Nathan Lawyers service to Barambah Regional Medical Service has been of a high professional standard. Nathan Lawyers always gave direct and sound advice to any legal matters asked by our organisation.


Timely reports and advice was given, with full support of the legal requirements to any decisions that our organisation had made. The legal advice was also articulated at a community level and was very culturally appropriate in the delivery of information.


Nathan Lawyers are very approachable and has communicated our organisations needs to exactly what was queried. I have no hesitation in recommending Nathan Lawyers to any employment, contracting and discrimination law case.


Bruce Simpson, CEO
Barambah Regional Medical Service




My company has used Rob’s law firm on a number of occasions. He has helped me with a commercial claim against one of my company businesses as well as providing assistance and advice to me about responding to a discrimination claim made by a former employee which was able to be resolved. I have been very happy with the service he has provided. His response times have been quick and his advice has been sensible and helpful.

Adam McEvoy, Director
McEvoy Rural Holdings Pty Ltd




Rob Stevenson acted for me in a discrimination complaint against a government department. After approaching the Queensland Public Interest Law Clearing House (QPILCH) for assistance, I consider myself to be very fortunate to have had Rob take up my case and represent me. After Rob accepted my case, I was able to apply for, and secure, limited financial assistance from Legal Aid Queensland.

In dealing with my complaint, Rob went to great lengths to explain with great clarity the entire process as well as my options. Rob put all issues in layman’s terms that were easily understood. I was able to discuss all issues and concerns with Rob, to which he was always able to provide practical and professional advice.

Although having a professional approach, Rob was always extremely easy to talk to. With Rob’s assistance a very satisfactory settlement to my complaint was reached. I was extremely pleased with and grateful for Rob’s representation of my complaint. I would have no hesitation in recommending Rob for legal representation.

Leonie Hartley




Allied Express has used Rob Stevenson’s services in a long running claim by a former contractor. Rob has impressed me with his calm, efficient manner and knowledge of the detail of the claim and we are happy with his conduct of the matter. He has regularly kept me advised of developments and he has been professional in his approach.

Jeanette Bonaccorso, State Manager
Allied Express Transport Pty Ltd




I have been dealing with Rob Stevenson for several years. I have found him to be a conscientious lawyer who prides himself on giving practical, timely and cost effective advice to his clients in the areas of employment and discrimination law.

Dr Peter Lynch
dci lyncon




Rob Stevenson has acted for us in the resolution of a discrimination claim in the Federal Magistrates Court. He gave detailed advice about the steps in the legal process, practical issues in the case and our options. He engaged experienced counsel and we worked as a team to successfully resolve the matter without the need for prolonged legal proceedings. I found him to be readily available to speak to and he impressed me as being experienced in employment and discrimination law. We were happy with his work.

Neil McDonald, Company Secretary and Manager – Legal Services
Hamilton Island Resort




Rob Stevenson has helped my company with several employment matters in recent years. These have included resolving a common law employment claim, giving advice about requirements for notice and the return of property on termination of employment as well as workers compensation issues. 


Rob has been prompt in returning my calls and emails and has provided detailed and timely advice which has been of assistance to the business. He doesn’t use too much legal jargon and his advice has been practical and useful. I would have no hesitation in recommending Rob’s expertise to other businesses with similar questions to mine.

Justin Barrett, Director
Barrett Shop Fitting Pty Ltd




Rob Stevenson has helped my company with legal advice, particularly in the employment area, for several years now. He has provided advice about the company’s employment and contracting arrangements and helped with draft contract documents. He has also provided advice and prepared letters for use in the termination of an employee. I operate a busy small business and I have found Rob to be accessible by telephone and he has also visited my office. He has given good, practical advice.

Patricia Newman, Director
Newman Transport Pty Ltd




Rob Stevenson has provided advice to my company about several complex and sensitive employment issues in recent years.  I have found him to be professional and courteous, readily available to talk to and good with providing advice in short timeframes. He has a practical approach and I have appreciated his advice and assistance. I have no difficulty in recommending his services in the employment law area.

Peter Hallahan, Chartered Accountant
Hallahan & Co




Rob Stevenson has been providing advice and assistance to the Employee Council and its members for over 10 years. Rob worked on the Council’s application as an enterprise union and has provided advice to many members over the years in situations ranging from disciplinary action to termination to claims for long service leave payments. He has also given advice to our industrial advisers on difficult legal points. I have always found him easy to contact and talk to and his advice has been practical and helpful to our members and the Council.

Chris Bath, Chief Executive Officer
Suncorp Group Employee Council